OHIO CARF ACCREDITATION SERVICES FOR GROUP HOMES

What are the benefits of being CARF accredited?

The benefits of conformance to the CARF standards can be realized by both the organization and its persons served.  For the organization, CARF accreditation is a catalyst for continuous quality improvement.  CARF surveyors apply a consultative, rather than inspective, approach.  They bring with them not only their own wisdom, but also the experience of similar organizations to promote quality within the industry.  All surveyors employed by CARF are currently working in CARF-accredited organizations.  For the consumer, choosing a CARF-accredited program or service can provide confidence that an organization is consumer focused and has met international standards for service delivery.

CARF emphasizes the delivery of person-centered services.  Persons served play an active and vital role in the CARF accreditation process, from helping to develop the international performance standards to giving input on the quality of services they receive. Through accreditation, providers demonstrate their belief that all people have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, have access to needed services that achieve optimum outcomes, and are empowered to exercise informed choice.

When a service or program is CARF accredited, it means it has undergone an in-depth review of its services and demonstrated substantial conformance to the CARF standards during the on-site survey. The service or program has demonstrated its commitment to delivering quality services that focus on the client’s specific strengths, abilities, needs and preferences.

For more information about CARF International, the standards, or the survey process, visit www.carf.org. Two documents that may be of interest are “Guide to Promoting Your Accreditation” and “CARF Surveyor Information.”  (These are available in the public domain on the CARF website.)

CARF Accreditation Outcomes

As described on the CARF website, there are several categories of accreditation decisions:

• Three-Year — optimal, most cost-effective outcome
• One-Year — re-survey in one year
• Provisional — re-survey in one year
• Nonaccreditation — loss of accreditation
• Preliminary — re-survey in six months